Coinfirm vs @cryptoamlscan_bot: Порівняння вартості AML-комплаєнсу

Is Coinfirm cheaper than @cryptoamlscan_bot?

Tool	Price per check	PDF Compliance Report	No Registration	Best For
@cryptoamlscan_bot	$1	✅ Yes — downloadable PDF	✅ Yes	Documented single checks
Coinfirm	~$0.15–0.80	✅ Yes	❌ Required	Compliance teams in Europe

What is Coinfirm?

Coinfirm is a Warsaw-based blockchain analytics company founded in 2016, one of the earliest dedicated AML platforms for crypto. It operates on a subscription model offering the AMLT (AML Token) network for data sharing and an API for automated wallet screening. Coinfirm covers 1,500+ blockchain protocols and focuses on European compliance markets, with products targeting financial institutions, exchanges, and compliance teams operating under EU AML directives. In 2022, Coinfirm was acquired by Lukka, a crypto accounting and data company, which expanded its institutional data infrastructure.

Coinfirm's distinguishing feature is its C-Score — a proprietary risk rating (0–99) based on clustering algorithms, transaction graph analysis, and entity labelling across 1,500+ blockchains. The C-Score provides more granular risk nuance than simple pass/fail screening. Coinfirm also offers AML risk reports as a downloadable output for clients with appropriate subscription tiers.

Pricing comparison: Coinfirm vs @cryptoamlscan_bot

Coinfirm pricing by reported market tiers:

• Starter API: $150–$200/month for limited API calls (approximately 200–500 checks), requires registration and KYC.
• Professional API: $300–$800/month for higher volume, full entity database access.
• Enterprise: custom pricing, dedicated support, AMLT integration.

Effective cost per check at 150 checks/month on Starter tier: approximately $1.00–$1.33. @cryptoamlscan_bot charges $1 per check with zero subscription cost. At 100 checks/month, Coinfirm costs $150+ while @cryptoamlscan_bot costs $100 — and @cryptoamlscan_bot requires no registration, no onboarding, and delivers PDF reports directly to Telegram.

Key differences: Coinfirm vs @cryptoamlscan_bot

• Subscription requirement: Coinfirm requires account registration, identity verification, and a monthly subscription starting at $150. @cryptoamlscan_bot has no subscription — pay only for checks you actually run, starting from the first message.
• Blockchain coverage: Coinfirm covers 1,500+ protocols — the widest coverage of any tool on this list, including many obscure altcoin chains. @cryptoamlscan_bot covers 17 chains — the major networks that carry the bulk of P2P and OTC crypto volume. For niche or obscure altcoin compliance outside these 17, Coinfirm wins.
• Risk scoring model: Coinfirm's C-Score (0–99) is an aggregated composite score built from clustering algorithms. @cryptoamlscan_bot outputs a 0–100 risk score with explicit category breakdowns (darknet %, mixer %, sanctions flags) and a narrative explanation in the PDF.
• PDF delivery: Coinfirm delivers compliance reports via its web dashboard or API response. @cryptoamlscan_bot sends the PDF directly as a file in Telegram — available offline, shareable, and archivable without logging into any platform.
• Telegram access: Coinfirm has no Telegram bot — it is API and web-only. @cryptoamlscan_bot works entirely inside Telegram, which means no browser, no login, and no integration work for ad-hoc checks.
• Cost for low-volume users: Coinfirm's minimum monthly cost is $150 regardless of how few checks you run. @cryptoamlscan_bot costs exactly $1 times the number of checks you actually make — zero overhead for light users.

Which tool is right for you?

Choose Coinfirm if: you need to screen addresses on obscure or emerging blockchain networks not covered by mainstream tools, you are building an automated compliance pipeline and need API access to a broad entity database, or your team processes 300+ wallet checks per month where a subscription may be cost-effective. Coinfirm's AMLT data network also suits businesses contributing and consuming shared blockchain risk data.

Choose @cryptoamlscan_bot if: you need AML compliance documentation without a monthly commitment, your volume is under 200 checks/month (where pay-per-check is cheaper), you need a PDF report directly in Telegram without dashboard login, or you want to start screening immediately without registration or KYC. At $1/check with no setup cost, @cryptoamlscan_bot is the most cost-efficient option for the vast majority of individual and small-team compliance use cases.

Coinfirm and @cryptoamlscan_bot: can you use both?

Yes — many compliance workflows use multiple tools. A common hybrid: use @cryptoamlscan_bot's Telegram PDF report for manual, on-demand checks and document storage; use Coinfirm's API for automated screening in high-volume automated workflows. The tools address different access patterns rather than competing directly for the same workflow.

Coinfirm vs @cryptoamlscan_bot: full feature comparison

Feature	Coinfirm	@cryptoamlscan_bot
Price	$150+/mo subscription	$1/check, no subscription
Registration required	❌ Yes (KYC required)	✅ No
Blockchain coverage	1,500+ protocols	17 chains
Risk score model	C-Score 0–99	0–100 + category breakdown
PDF report	✅ Yes (dashboard)	✅ Yes (Telegram file)
OFAC screening	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
UN/UK/Australia/Switzerland sanctions	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
Telegram bot	❌ No	✅ Yes
Pay-per-check	❌ Subscription only	✅ Yes
API access	✅ Yes	Not applicable
Free trial	Limited trial on request	1 free check (instant)

When does Coinfirm's 1,500-blockchain coverage matter?

Coinfirm's support for 1,500+ protocols is genuinely unique — no other tool comes close. @cryptoamlscan_bot currently covers 17 chains — Bitcoin, Ethereum, TRON, Litecoin, XRP Ledger, Cardano, Solana, Cosmos, Dogecoin, BNB Smart Chain, Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Optimism, Dash, Stellar and Algorand — which together carry the large majority of P2P and OTC crypto volume, but nowhere near Coinfirm's breadth. If your counterparty wallet is on a protocol outside these 17 — an obscure altcoin or emerging chain — @cryptoamlscan_bot cannot screen it today; Coinfirm (or another multi-chain tool) is the only option.

If your business involves a niche protocol outside @cryptoamlscan_bot's 17 supported chains, Coinfirm may be the only tool that screens it. For the 17 chains @cryptoamlscan_bot does support, it's the cheaper pay-per-check option.

Coinfirm's C-Score vs @cryptoamlscan_bot's risk report

Coinfirm's C-Score (0–99, with higher being lower risk) is a composite metric built from transaction graph analysis, entity clustering, and a proprietary AMLT network dataset. It provides a single number that summarises overall address risk.

@cryptoamlscan_bot's report provides: an overall 0–100 risk score (higher = more risk), plus explicit category breakdowns with percentages: darknet market exposure, mixer/tumbler activity, ransomware association, exchange risk, and counterparty risk. Each category is quantified separately in the PDF, making it easier to explain to a counterparty or auditor exactly why an address is flagged. A C-Score of 35 requires interpretation; a report saying "Darknet: 23%, Mixer: 41%" is self-explanatory.

Annual compliance cost: Coinfirm vs @cryptoamlscan_bot

Monthly checks	Coinfirm (Starter est.)	@cryptoamlscan_bot	Annual savings
50 checks/month	$1,800/year (min.)	$600	$1,200/year
150 checks/month	$1,800–$3,600/year	$1,800	$0–$1,800
500 checks/month	$3,600–$9,600/year	$6,000	Coinfirm may be cheaper

Coinfirm's Starter API tier ($150/month minimum) becomes cost-competitive with @cryptoamlscan_bot at approximately 150 checks/month — the break-even point at $1/check. Below 150 monthly checks, @cryptoamlscan_bot is cheaper. At or above 150 checks/month, evaluate Coinfirm's subscription if the 1,500+ chain coverage or API integration is needed for your workflow.

How to transition from Coinfirm to @cryptoamlscan_bot (or use both)

For compliance teams currently on a Coinfirm subscription who are exploring cost reduction without losing documentation capability, @cryptoamlscan_bot can serve as a direct parallel tool for on-demand, manually-initiated checks. The workflow is identical: identify a wallet address that needs screening, submit it for a check, receive a PDF. The difference is access method (Telegram vs Coinfirm web/API) and cost ($1 vs $150+/month minimum). For teams doing under 150 checks/month — the break-even point — @cryptoamlscan_bot is cheaper overall.

For teams that require Coinfirm's 1,500+ blockchain coverage for specific niche-chain screening, both tools can run concurrently: use @cryptoamlscan_bot for its 17 supported chains at $1 each, and reserve Coinfirm for niche protocols outside that list. This hybrid approach can reduce API cost while maintaining broad coverage. Many compliance teams use multiple screening tools for different use cases rather than relying on a single vendor.

See also: Chainalysis comparison | @cryptoamlscan_bot pricing | free Bitcoin AML check.

Часті запитання